Kodak says it might have to cease operations [updated]

mastry | 311 points

Hey uhh have you guys seen this?

"Media reports that Kodak is ceasing operations, going out of business, or filing for bankruptcy are inaccurate and reflect a fundamental misunderstanding of a recent technical disclosure the Company made to the SEC in its recently filed second quarter earnings report. These articles are misleading and missing critical context, and we'd like to set the record straight."

https://www.kodak.com/en/company/blog-post/statement-regardi...

guerrilla | 6 days ago

Maybe I'm reading the headlines wrong, but it doesn't seem like a lot of people read the actual press release and earnings report from the August 11th, 2025[1]:

1) The "Going Concern Assessment" that they put out was a regulatory requirement because they didn't have full control of the sale of parts of the pension. They say in the release that they're going to have the sale finalized on December 15th, with details on August 15th

2) They not only mention opening a new business segment, but built a lab AND got FDA approval for that segment (Advanced Materials & Chemicals)

3) The sale of the pension is going to have so much of a surplus they're going to pay down parts of the long debt that they have.

I'd love to be corrected if I'm misreading this, but the reports of Kodak's death seem greatly exaggerated

[1]: https://investor.kodak.com/news-releases/news-release-detail...

jspann | 6 days ago

Not many people remember, but it wasn't that long ago that Kodak was "pivoting to crypto": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KodakCoin

At that point, it was pretty clear that they're on borrowed time. I'm surprised they had enough runway / credit to make it to 2025.

xenotux | 6 days ago

Interesting to compare the tech companies of last century with those of this era.

Kodak employed a whole town, and many more people besides. We're now waiting on a one-person unicorn.

The number of people benefiting from an enterprise has shrunk considerably, with the benefits accruing more tightly within an already wealthy class.

specproc | 8 days ago

To be honest, I thought they were already completely gone. The article mentions them filing for bankruptcy in 2012.

They were pretty much doomed from the start. They had built their business by taking a cut from every picture you took, from the rolls of film to the developing to the printing. There was absolutely nothing in the digital camera realm that could duplicate that; their revenue dropped like a rock. If they had sold every single digital camera ever bought, it wouldn't have made up for it.

The contrast between Kodak and Fujifilm is fascinating. Fujifilm survived by pivoting to manufacturing critical components for LCD panels, which were exploding in popularity at the time. https://web.archive.org/web/20250704224940/https://petapixel...

mark-r | 6 days ago

Destin from SmarterEveryDay did a series of videos on making film at a Kodak plant:

* https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLjHf9jaFs8XXcmtNSUxoa...

throw0101a | 8 days ago

My grandpa (father's father) grew up in Rochester and that was the first time I visited New York for a family reunion, way back in the early aughts. Kodak was the major employer in town then; he and practically everyone he knew either worked there, had dealings with them in some form, or knew many others who did. When we went, I had the pleasure of touring the place and hearing plenty of stories from my gramps and our family. Good times.

ddoolin | 8 days ago

Back in the day when photographic plates were used to capture images from astronomical telescopes, occasionally the excitement of a new discovery was followed by the disappointment of realizing that it was just a blemish in the emulsion, also known as an "Eastman Kodak Object".

martinpw | 6 days ago

> Kodak aims to conjure up cash by ceasing payments for its retirement pension plan.

I assume this means payments to retirees. It's a good reminder that (if you can help it) you should not rely 100% on any external source (including the government) for your retirement income.

mastry | 8 days ago

That's pretty sad. I find their color film resolves better than Ilford's B&W stuff (I know it's apples to oranges, but if I'm shooting B&W, I kind of want the detail...). Their film is also generally easier to find than Provia or Velvia, for medium format at least.

Scene_Cast2 | 6 days ago

It’s sad to see. As I understand it, digital photography forced camera companies to decide if they were principally about film or about photos and imaging. The competition in the image space was brutal, which phones winning the mass market by a huge margin. Those that quietly moved into recondite but valuable areas of technical specialisation did much better, but they’re not camera companies anymore.

moomin | 8 days ago

They should re-market as an anti-AI documentation company that uses analogue capture techniques. Use film!

lucasyvas | 6 days ago

Statement Regarding Misleading Media Reports https://www.kodak.com/en/company/blog-post/statement-regardi...

kkc11 | 6 days ago

There are lots of hidden dependencies in the world, who knows what depends on the reliable production of polymer/emulsion products.

It could be that we stop being able to make chips, or printers, or something else because of this as a second or third order effect.

mikewarot | 8 days ago

I remember when they tried to make a crypto currency a few years ago I knew it was well past a shadow of its former self.

siavosh | 7 days ago
[deleted]
| 8 days ago
[deleted]
| 8 days ago

The MBAs that outsourced camera production to APEC are long retired.

mensetmanusman | 6 days ago

Even my DSLR is gathering dust.

beardyw | 8 days ago

They literally invented the digital camera

iancmceachern | 7 days ago

> Kodak aims to conjure up cash by ceasing payments for its retirement pension plan

I have always wondered, what happens to a pension plan when the company files for bankruptcy? What happens if the lump sum payment is not enough for retirees? Are they financially screwed until they die?

SamuelAdams | 6 days ago

Visited one of the biggest computer, electronics, and household appliance shop in the country (in Europe) last week. Was surprised that they actually had chemical films on the shelf. Not a big variety, and only limited numbers. Only one brand: Kodak.

Myself I shot slides from 1977 to 2001. Was not a big fan of Kodakchrome colors, preferred Fujichrome. And they were also cheaper, relevant for a student budget. After working with one of the first camera phones I have not bought any roll of film, even if in hindsight 100 KB VGA pictures were somewhat limiting... Now I mostly avoid taking photos because I won't have enough time in my life to keep them organized and watch them...

usr1106 | 6 days ago

Anyone remember KodakCoin? [1] The price tripled overnight. Good times.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KodakCoin

mv4 | 6 days ago

Hard to watch a company that once defined photography now circling the drain... especially one that literally invented the digital camera, then buried it to protect film sales

HexPhantom | 6 days ago

It was Rochester's largest employer for so long. Now it's become a bit of local trivia, much like Xerox. Both of them struggled to deal with changing markets.

TomMasz | 8 days ago

Pharmaceuticals manufacturing is an obvious way to sustain a business that has a "halo" product that is a product of chemistry. If you think you still need to sell film to even be Kodak, then having boringly profitable chemical work keeps a lot of your processes, certifications and facilities ticking over, I guess. Fujifilm do much the same thing with cosmetics.

exasperaited | 6 days ago

We need an American Samsung-like company. Kodak could have been it.

Then again, Sears could have made Amazon a pets-dot-com flash in the pan.

smm11 | 6 days ago

Wait, Kodak is still around?

I'm not trying to be a dick or shitpost, but I genuinely thought they collapsed after I heard nothing about KodakCoin after the initial announcement.

tombert | 6 days ago

It's not really the same company it was... just a name now.

physicsguy | 8 days ago

Kodak film is legendary. There's nothing like watching a movie shot on Kodak Film. Hopefully, they can find a solution.

heldrida | 6 days ago

I’m curious if this is tied to U.S. intelligence having to cut back on spending. They’ve been tight with Kodak over the years.

cannes1 | 6 days ago

Dang, this would suck. I really like Kodak film, like Portra 400 and Ektar 100.

Writing’s been on the wall for quite a while though. I’m not surprised.

williamscales | 7 days ago

> Presteign did not care for the artists, musicians, and fops Olivia kept about her, but he was pleased to see a scattering of society notables this morning.

> There was a Sears-Roebuck, a Gillet, young Sidney Kodak who would one day be Kodak of Kodak, a Houbigant, Buick of Buick, and R. H. Macy XVI, head of the powerful Saks-Gimbel clan.

- The Stars My Destination

drakenot | 6 days ago

Biggest brand failure in my memory. "Kodak Moments" could have been used forever.

bsenftner | 6 days ago

They could have ruled the world V298768.

smm11 | 6 days ago

The most important aspect is to save/conserve the equipment and knowledge so it would be possible for somebody else to take over. Something like this happened with Polaroid - a group of enthusiasts got Polaroid equipment and managed to partially restore the development of Polaroid integral instant film (the one where everything is packed into single package). Unfortunately the much more beautiful and photo like "peel apart" instant film was already scraped by both Polaroid and Fuji. I would even consider this a cultural vandalism, similar to destroying important cultural artifacts.

genman | 8 days ago
[deleted]
| 6 days ago

No it didn't, lmao. Modern hellscape nightmare of false news, parroting misinformation and general apathy to actually checking facts.

Kodak has even had to release a statement in response to this nonsense.

Anyway, buy Kodak film, maybe they'll bring some of the older ones back after they've cleared debts.

fennecbutt | 6 days ago

Pitbull (Mr. Worldwide) will be sad to hear this. Picture that with a Kodak.

impish9208 | 8 days ago

[dead]

alienslanded | 6 days ago

[flagged]

zzzeek | 7 days ago

I'm confused. Isn't kodak a printer company?

siva7 | 7 days ago