> Open source: Pontoon is free to use by anyone
And yet, the top level license file contains two licenses, a goddamn if statement, and finally a default to Elastic License which is not open source
Then, because if this trickery, lawyers get to make good money because does "2. LICENSE file in the same directory as the work" combined with "4. Defaults to Elastic License 2.0 (ELv2)" mean that this zero byte file NAMED LICENSE but devoid of any content match clause 2 or 4?
https://github.com/pontoon-data/Pontoon/blob/v0.2.0/data-tra...
I hate cutesy licenses with all my heart. Just say you want to use Elastic, drop the Open Source pretense, and go back to selling software instead of trying to position yourself as "open"
No educated person is going to give you free commits in the current state so no need to be opaque in hopes of tricking them
What does the row "First-class Data Products" in the comparison table entail?
Not to be confused with Pontoon, a self-hostable translation platform made by Mozilla: https://github.com/mozilla/pontoon
Is it like an offline sync?
Congrats on the launch! I'm one of the cofounders of Prequel (I saw our name in the feature grid - small nit: we do support self-hosting). This is definitely a problem worth solving - the market is still early and I'd bet the rising tide will help all of us convince more teams to support this capability. I'm not a lawyer, but the latest EU Data Act might even make it an obligation for some software vendors?
Maybe I can save you a headache: Snowflake is actively deprecating single-factor username/password auth in favor of key pair auth, so the faster you support that, the fewer mandatory migrations you'll be emailing users about.