(Without having any knowledge on this but making assumptions… vibing lol)
I think early humans were probably a mix of both. The goal was survival, and idk what sort of language we had either, so just eat, reproduce, etc. Oo ahh ahh goo goo gah gah -rub armpit- ahhh ooo ahh (wine making instructions after gather berry’s lol)
Once we figured out agriculture and farming we didn’t need to gather and hunt.
moomoo11 | 43 minutes ago
This is exactly what the Illuminati wants you to believe.
not_your_vase | 13 hours ago
It's not something you can conclusively prove, and the answer probably wasn't the uniform across groups.
klooney | 12 hours ago
100% hunters. It's just easier to hunt plants because they don't move around.
thanatos519 | 13 hours ago
Always on a hunt for a new iPhone.
iExploder | 7 hours ago
We were Banthers
jugnu | 13 hours ago
Probably not. Several evolutionary hypothesis, suggest that reliance on hunting is what made us different from the rest of the great apes[1][2]. There is literally an extinction event caused by our hunting[3]. Where early humans showed up megafauna quickly went extinct.[4]
[1]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunting_hypothesis [2]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Endurance_running_hypothesis [3]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene_extinction [4]. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megafauna#Megafaunal_mass_exti...