I am not giving a position on whether UFOs are real or not, or to what degree, but god this is just such a horrendous article. As you read it, count how many huge claims the article throws out as fact, and count how many of those claims the author provides a source for, a source other than just "unnamed investigators say". You will find a grand total of 0 of the claims the article makes has any evidence or source provided for it.
And of course they have to throw in the various partisan quips here and there, because of course they just can't help themselves, of course they have to try to score their political points.
Even the times in the article when they're referring to actual studies that exist in the real world, they can't even be bothered to name the studies. No sources needed, no evidence needed, just some anonymous WSJ "investigator" says something is true.
I am not giving a position on whether UFOs are real or not, or to what degree, but god this is just such a horrendous article. As you read it, count how many huge claims the article throws out as fact, and count how many of those claims the author provides a source for, a source other than just "unnamed investigators say". You will find a grand total of 0 of the claims the article makes has any evidence or source provided for it.
And of course they have to throw in the various partisan quips here and there, because of course they just can't help themselves, of course they have to try to score their political points.
Even the times in the article when they're referring to actual studies that exist in the real world, they can't even be bothered to name the studies. No sources needed, no evidence needed, just some anonymous WSJ "investigator" says something is true.