A safer process here would be 'fail open', require those with a vested interest to prove they require that the public NOT have those abilities rather than the present default of owners (buyer's / end users) rights being infringed upon.

[flagged]

Have to wonder about the sincerity of this after Yasha Levine illustrated the ties between big tech and the EFF, when big tech’s present theory of copyright is:

> Our Copyright: based and red-pilled

> Your Copyright: fake and gay